-
Re: Modification Briefs - Best practices
@"Hrant H. Papazian" The only thing you achieve with such posts is eye rolls from the people you might have hoped to convert to your viewpoint. More importantly, as far as I can tell your p…9 -
Re: A new type publishing brand
It’s good that you’re thinking about your brand, and also how that might be represented visually. Yet—and I’m saying this in an over the top manner to make a point: your logo is the least important t…3 -
Re: Two thoughts about Google after Typographics
@ybaggar: Totally respect your opinion of intensely disagreeing with Google Fonts, but asking trollish questions (how much does it pay? oh that’s a job for idiots anyway) isn’t exactly what this foru…2 -
Re: Two thoughts about Google after Typographics
It’s the first Google Fonts family created by a hip indie foundry as far as I know, so I don’t think there’s any precedent to either the printed specimen or the naming convention on that specimen. Wh…1 -
Re: Two thoughts about Google after Typographics
To reply to @"Maurice Meilleur"’s opening post, I don’t think your first point about Google possibly wanting to sell type has any basis in reality. The global type market is a tiny, fragmen…3
